Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 30



File:Liars Single Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Liars Single Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Syarzhuk ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Decorative use of the non-free cover art of a song in Einstürzende Neubauten logo which fails WP:NFCC, WP:NFCC and WP:NFC. Non-free cover art is generally OK when used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the work in question, but it's use in other ways or in other articles tends to be much harder to justify. This file would most likely be OK if used at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand-alone article about the song iself; so, if someone wants to write such an article and add the file to it, then it could be kept; otherwise, there's no sourced critical commentary about the cover itself to provide the context for non-fee use in the article about the symbol to satisfy NFCC#8 and there is already another freely licensed image used for identifying the symbol, which means a non-free is not needed fpr that purpose per NFCC#1. -- -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pop Network Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Pop Network Logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mrschimpf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Seems to be eligible for transfer to Commons, but sending here to make sure. Steel1943 (talk) 03:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Support transfer to Commons  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dreamland.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Dreamland.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Vaunen ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Superseded by higher quality scan: File:Meet-Me-Tonight-in-Dreamland-1909.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KDA performers in motion capture suits.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * File:KDA performers in motion capture suits.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Satellizer ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Decorative fair use image. The image is not discussed in the article at all, and is not necessary for readers to understand the article, thereby failing NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it's informative and shows an aspect that isn't immediately obvious to readers. If it's not mentioned in the article, WP:SOFIXIT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant sourced commentary about the image. If User:Zxcvbnm wants to fix it, they are welcome to do so. -- Whpq (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muammar Gaddafi, 1973.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Muammar Gaddafi, 1973.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by StanMan87 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is tagged PD-Libya, but source page indicates that the photo comes from Rex Features, so there is no guarantee that this work was first published in Libya. Rex Features is a photo agency, not unlike Getty Images, so it's most likely still copyrighted in the U.S. — howcheng  {chat} 16:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ffmovie1994.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Ffmovie1994.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Lajbi ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is a promotional still from an unreleased film showing the main cast. The image was used in the Cast section of The Fantastic Four (unreleased film) and was recently moved to the Marketing and release plans section. The fair use rationale states its purpose is "Illustration of an example within the article.", which I have no idea what that means. The image fails WP:NFCC since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself in either section of the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It is a small part of a larger image, and at low resolution. (It is a cropped and slightly edited version of the cover of Film Threat magazine). It shows the main cast in costume, and gives an impression of the creature effects makeup for this version of the Thing (comics). I think removing it would be substantially detrimental to understanding the film.
 * It is a great image that significantly improves the article, and in one small image provides great insight into the look of the film (easily compared to the other films ). The real problem is that the poster image used in the infobox is a minimal teaser image that doesn't show any of this (unlike the posters for every other FF film which do show the cast). Losing the infobox image would be no great loss to the article. Maybe this image doesn't precisely meet the rules but if we can find a reason to keep the article would be better for it. Improving articles and making a better encyclopedia is what it is all about right? -- 109.78.193.37 (talk) 13:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


 * This opinion just brings up more problems with the image. Since the image is a portion of a magazine cover, the fair use rationale is incorrect in stating it is the "Full promotional image as released." and the licensing is wrong in that it should use Template:Non-free magazine cover. This means the whole cover needs to be used with the magazine's name and should be used to "to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question" and not about the subject of the image. The only exception to this would be if the image has critical commentary, which here this is none about the image. The purpose of use of "Illustration of an example within the article." is so vague that it needs to be changed to match any sourced critical commentary of the image if it is added to the article before the image could be considered to pass WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.