Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 July 14



File:Povo mfa.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. The delete argument is much more detailed than the keep one. If people want to use the file in João Abel Manta, they can ask on my talk page, WP:REFUND or WP:DELREV as appropriate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Povo mfa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by BBird ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The file is a fair use poster used on Carnation Revolution. However, the use of this fair use file seems to be an addition, instead of a crucial part of the article. Therefore, the file may violate WP:NFCC. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a trivially-obvious truism that we can still write any article without use of any media. But that is not the point of NFCC 8.  NFCC 8 requires use to "significantly increase readers' understanding".  Not even to "considerably increase" it, merely significantly.  I believe that this is met here. The poster is not merely used in the article, it is discussed and the embedded symbology within it is discussed. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The use rationale for this image is invalid on its face; there is not even an attempt to indicate which elements of the article it increases the understanding of. The image is not associated with any article text relating to the specific poster, posters of the same general type, or political posters in general. This is a purely decorative image, a point that is admittedly made poorly in the nomination statement. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: It would be more appropriate in the article João Abel Manta. The introduction of the article describes João Abel Manta as "architect, painter, illustrator and cartoonist". IMO, it is acceptable to have examples of various types of work of the artist in this article. The article currently has one example of his work as architect and one example of his work as cartoonist. This poster can be one example of his work as illustrator. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scott Ellsworth 1.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Scott Ellsworth 1.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Shelyric ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No valid license. Wikipedia-only permission does not create a free license, and there is no reason to believe that the copyright to this "media photograph" is owned by the subject rather than the unidentified media outlet which took the photo and originally published it. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 12:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given above by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz unless the copyright holder's WP:CONSENT can be verified by Wikimedia OTRS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ann Richards 1955.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Ann Richards 1955.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Shelyric ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid PD claim. No evidence that this image was originally published without a copyright notice. Source is a 2017 republication of the image where no notice was required. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 12:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given above by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz unless the copyright holder's WP:CONSENT can be verified by Wikimedia OTRS or it can clearly be shown the original publication of the image was actually without a coyright notice. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.