Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 30



File:Kennedy Sanford.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Kennedy Sanford.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Leonardocognoscenti ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image usage failing WP:NFCC. This image of a meeting with John F. Kennedy is not needed to understand the topic which is Arthur and Stella Sanford House. Whpq (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LLVM Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No action. Non-free license is non-free - F ASTILY   04:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:LLVM Logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by WhiteTimberwolf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File is listed as non-free, but appears to be under a free use license as stated on the website: "This dragon image is owned by Apple Inc. and is available for your download and use royalty-free. By downloading this image, Apple grants you, and you accept, a non-exclusive license to use this image. All right, title and interest in the image, including the copyright therein, is retained by Apple." The software itself is released under the UIUC license and is in the process of being converted to a version of the Apache License. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 19:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Retain as nonfree - that is not a free license. There is no statement about derivative works or commercial use.  -- Whpq (talk) 19:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:City hall model.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * File:City hall model.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cmdrbond ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed PD-USGov, because it was obtained from the City of Beverly Hills website. I am not sure if PD-CAGov applies to works by city governments. The city government claims copyright (see source website). Wikiacc (¶) 00:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That is a good question. County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition - the ruling cited in the template - was about a California county, so that sounds like PD-CAGov applies to all levels of government irrespective of whether they are state, county or city. The court ruling does not unambiguously state the reach of the decision, but it seems like it wasn't meant to apply to counties only. Official websites bearing spurious copyright claims is something that happens frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 20:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. According to the Commons version of the template, it applies to "a government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies) that derives its powers from the laws of the State of California". Also, transfer to Commons. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.