Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 October 8



File:Restless Overexposure.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Technically close to "keep" seeing as the delete camp is mostly framed in "not sure this meets NFCC#8" rather than "does not meet NFCC#8". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Restless Overexposure.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Drovethrughosts ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There's already one piece of non-free media showing the visual style. I'm not sure that two can be justified. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Why not? The episode is known for its unique visual style and that's why there are images, which are backed by it being discussed in the article along with sources. The article was promoted to GA with said images and there was no issue. I'd happily replace the second image with another example, if you believe there's a better choice. I worked hard on that article back in 2011 to get it to GA, so I'd like for it to stay intact–images and all. Drovethrughosts (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Just going to point out WP:ITSGA here since passing through an FA/GA discussion without being noticed or being used in an FA/GA article doesn't automatically mean WP:NFCCP compliance. However, this does seem to be pretty close to if not already meeting WP:NFC (i.e. WP:NFCC) given that it's used to help the reader understand how a particular filming technique was used in support of article content about the technique. Personally, I think it would be better if there was a secondary source cited for the content along with the DVD audio commentary cited by Wheldon in support of that; that would make the justification for the non-free use of this particular screenshot stronger in my opinion. Are there any secondary sources that can be found which discusses the filming techniques used for this episode? -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the overexposure visible in this image has adjacent sourced critical commentary. The other image is used to illustrate other visual aspects. Two images to make two separate points is not excessive. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Veronica - Vatican2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * File:Veronica - Vatican2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Golden Lion size.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * File:Golden Lion size.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.