Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 October 9



File:Victory To the Prisoners Poster.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Victory To the Prisoners Poster.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Domer48 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image does not seem to meet NFCC as usually applied. The poster is not actually discussed in the article and does not otherwise meet NFCC #8: Contextual significance. Zerach (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep  Which article was that?   Because the public campaign to win political status for the IRA prisoners is certainly notable and this poster should be part of that. Was it recently removed?  Did you check the edit history? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robots- Original Motion Picture Soundtrack.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, per discussion below - F ASTILY   04:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Robots- Original Motion Picture Soundtrack.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Woojy88 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Robots (2005 film). Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.This file was proposed for deletion, but de-prodded by the uploader. So, I bring it up for further discussion here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC); [Note: Post stricken through by Marchjuly as explained below. -- 13:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)]
 * Well I must go on to disagree with User:Marchjuly. As an album cover the image is in full compliance with WP:Upload/Non-free album cover, WP:Manual of Style/Music together with WP:WikiProject Albums. With that being so there's thus no rationale for the file to be deleted whatsoever.Woojy88 (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The relevant Wikipedia policy as initially explained in the proposed deletion nomination and above when it comes to non-free content is WP:NFCC. The fact the you uploaded the file using the file upload wizard doesn't mean that the way the file is being used complies with this policy. Moreover, the fact that you provided a non-free use rationale for a particular non-free use doesn't mean it's complies with this policy (see WP:JUSTONE). Non-free album covers can be uploaded and used as explained in item 1 of WP:NFCI, but this is generally when the cover art is being used for primary identification purposes as at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand-alone Wikipedia article about the album in question. Trying to use album cover art in other ways or in other article requires a much stronger justification as explained in WP:NFC. Movie soundtrack covers are generally Ok when used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the soundtrack album itself, but there use in "soundtrack" or "music" sections of article about the movie are not considered acceptable per WP:FILMSCORE, unless there is some specific sourced critical commentary about the cover itself somewhere in the relevant section. If you believe this album satisfies WP:NALBUM and want to create a stand-alone article about it, then feel free to do so and the file's non-free use can then be assessed based upon that. At the same time, if you can find sourced critical commentary about the cover and want to add that to the section of the movie's article about the soundtrack, then feel free to do that. As is, however, this type non-free use is pretty much not allowed per relevant policy and relevant Wikipedia project guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * As per your noteworthy guidelines i've gone on to start a new article of the soundtrack as an album. Woojy88 (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It's not "my" policies or guidelines; it's Wikipedia's. Since you created a stand-alone article about the album and have removed the file from the film's article, I have stricken my original post because it no longer applies to the way the file is now being used. You should, however, update the article parameter in the non-free use rationale accordingly so that it reflects the way the file is now being used; if you leave the rationale as is, the file's likely going to be removed from the album's article by a WP:BOT per WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep now that it is the primary image in its own stand-alone article. Salavat (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.