Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 25



File:ASHFAQ AHMAD SHAH.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * File:ASHFAQ AHMAD SHAH.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ashfaq Fazal ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

User's only contributions to any project other than a few edits in 2018 are to upload selfies and write an autobiography on his Commons user page. WP:NOTHERE The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles chiniquy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Charles chiniquy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Beauce1977 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image has no source or authorship information. While the subject died over 100 years ago, without a source, there's no way we can keep this. While unlikely, it could be a modern illustration, could be inaccurate identification, etc. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Streets of Rage 2 action.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Streets of Rage 2 action.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bridies ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC #1 (No free equivalent), as it's being used to illustrate the article on the game's genre, and there are several freely licensed game screeshots that can replace it. Also fails NFCC #8 as the image itself isn't the subject of critical commentary. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mannina Maga audio cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Mannina Maga audio cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kannada123 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

More than 1 non-free poster, does not follow #3a of non-free content usage policy. Regards. Titodutta (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons Movie Opening Credits.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * File:The Simpsons Movie Opening Credits.ogg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Adammw ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

At first, I thought about shortening the video clip to no more than thirty seconds per WP:NFCC. However, I'm unsure whether even shortening would make the clip of the opening sequence of The Simpsons Movie more acceptable because WP:NFC discourages using video clips unless reliably sourced commentary can suffice the justification of the usage. Furthermore, per WP:NFCCEG, even when the clip might comply with WP:NFCC, especially "contextual significance" (#8), a file may still be unacceptable, especially when the commentary in the accompanying text is unsourced. The page "The Simpsons opening sequence" easily describes what the video depicts, and I think most readers can already grasp what the section describes without watching the video. That could be the argument that the clip fails criterion #8 and WP:NFC. I'm honestly unsure whether deleting the video clip can make any difference or affect the understanding of the series's bunch of opening sequences, like the live-action one from "Homer Simpson, This Is Your Wife", conveyed by the article itself, which is tagged for issues, like sourcing and in-universe perspective. George Ho (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.