Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 13



So-called Fair-Used medical images

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete - F ASTILY   03:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Familial hyperestrogenism in a male.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Vanished 45kd09la13 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Gynecomastia due to familial hyperestrogenism in two young siblings.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Vanished 45kd09la13 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Estrogen insensitivity syndrome in a female.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Medgirl131 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Estrogen insensitivity syndrome with adipomastia in a female.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Medgirl131 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

In my opinion, they did not agreed to use their naked images on Wikipedia. Using these images are immoral and may not fit for Fair Use. We shouldn't use these images. --Sharouser (talk) 05:30, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, these two images about familial hyperestrogenism depict children. We should not use them without consents. --Sharouser (talk) 15:30, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete People with these conditions exist, so it is possible to create a free equivalent. buidhe 03:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marguerite Higgins.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Like GermanJoe below, after conducting an exhaustive search, I have been unable to find any evidence copyright was renewed; I'm reasonably confident this is PD. Of course, if someone can prove otherwise, the file may be restored immediately. Also noting that the file has been transferred to Commons as File:Marguerite Higgins 483.jpg - F ASTILY   05:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Marguerite Higgins.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Alcmaeonid ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A cropped version of the same file appears at Commons under the same name and under a PD-US-not renewed claim. Does someone know how to verify that? ? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the Commons version. We are dealing with the 6 October 1950 edition of Life and it appears to still be copyrighted, according to what it says at Commons:Category:Covers of LIFE magazine. b<b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 08:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, are you voting to keep the local version? (As I'm sure you're aware, WP:FFD has no authority to delete Commons images.) Wikiacc (¶) 03:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - A brief check in the copyright registry did not reveal any Life renewals for this period (2nd half of 1950, and 1st half of 1951). However, searching in these online archives is a pain so it's easy to miss entries. Frankly, I would keep the image here on en-Wiki. If the image is PD, our free-use rationale is a bit flawed but that's not a big deal. If the image is not PD, our non-free image usage here is valid anyway. On a sidenote, Commons does not say that all Life images except from 1944 until 1945 are copyrighted, the intro on Commons recommends to look each image up on a case by case base. The file uploader on Commons seems to be an experienced contributor with hundreds of uploads, so I would assume they did check this point. GermanJoe (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per GermanJoe, until an exhaustive search finds no record of renewal. Wikiacc (¶) 03:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PrakashSingh Dadwal.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * File:PrakashSingh Dadwal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Studentarticle ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This and the Commons file are almost exactly the same, just with a different brightness. The Commons file makes a clearer licence claim, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete' local version. Commons version is slightly better and has much clearer licensing. Wikiacc (¶) 03:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SenateHouseExhibition.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * File:SenateHouseExhibition.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Neurofreak ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Please see File talk:SenateHouseExhibition.jpg. This file was uploaded as non-free, but the uploader claims it is a freely licensed image. Bringing this to FFD for further evaluation as a neutral party. <b style="color:#4169E1;">Ə</b> XPLICIT 23:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment The claimed license appears to be c:Template:GODL-India. Wikiacc (¶) 04:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.