Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 November 24



Tokio Hotel logos

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC violation - F ASTILY   02:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Tokio Hotel Logo 2005-2011.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bandit5660 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Tokio Hotel 2016-2018.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bandit5660 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Tokio Hotel Emblem 2020.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bandit5660 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The stated purpose of these non-free logos is to "show history of the logos used", but there is no significant sourced commentary about the logos, nor their history. A couple of the logos might be considered to be below the threshold of originality, in which case they can be relicensed and kept. With respect to the 2005-2011 logo, there are explody bits on the logo which I believe means this is copyrightable although it is borderline. The 2016-2018 logo has a starfield background and 3-D shading which makes it copyrightable. The 2020 logo is two of the same line drawing shapes on a black background. This looks to be too simple for copyright and should be relicensed. -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I've altered the first two logos accordingly, showing the features of the logo and where they were used in the past. As for the 2020 logo, would you know how to change the image from a non-free licence to a free licence without having to reupload the file? Your info would really help. Thanks. Bandit5660 (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2020 (GMT)
 * Altering the rationale does not resolve the issue. There needs to be significant sourced commentary about the logos in the article itself. -- Whpq (talk) 12:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Alberton Football logos

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep File:Alberton football league logo.png, delete File:Alberton Football league logo.jpg - F ASTILY   02:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Alberton football league logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Yamtrig ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Alberton Football league logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Yamtrig ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Alberton football league logo.png is claimed under WP:NFCC, however logo may not meet the Threshold of Orignality. There is also another orphaned image File:Alberton Football league logo.jpg, tagged under CC SA, which this image could be replaced with. (Perhaps the other could possibly be deleted if not used since it is of lower resolution.) P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like the PNG has been converted to fair use so delete the JPG as redundant to the PNG as well as incorrect licensing and keep the PNG. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree with Salavat here. —  WinnerWolf99  talkWhat did I break now? 16:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.