Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 October 27



File:Roblox Studio 2020.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Roblox Studio 2020.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by PrincessPandaWiki ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image stated to be used to " illustrate what the interface of Roblox Studio game engine looks like, to further support the commentary of", but there is no sourced commentary about the studio interface. Fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roblox Default Male Avatar.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Roblox Default Male Avatar.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by PrincessPandaWiki ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image is stated to be used "The usual style of the Roblox avatar, such as blocky body, which is often used to associate with Roblox", but there is no significant sourced commentary about the avatar styles. Fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sunset in Ilocos.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Sunset in Ilocos.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ice bear johny ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Images uploaded to other platforms before they're uploaded to Wikipedia require OTRS verification with more complete source information. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That is mine tho, wdym? I stated it in the file. What more could you possibly need? Like bruh everything i post somehow contradicts rules >:((
 * Oh no, you didn't do anything wrong. But license information for images need to be verifiable. So you could do one of two things. You could go to your Facebook page and add a note to your image that you're releasing it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license (CC BY SA 3.0), or submit a ticket to WP:OTRS. Either way, you need to link back to your Facebook page. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've done the former. Is it finished? Slr I was cramming 129 homeworks in one month ahhaha
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M.O.G Beatz Portrait2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:M.O.G Beatz Portrait2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Wikipro17 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image has been previously published at https://twitter.com/MOGBeatz/status/1263510324763930624. Requires OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Tagged with WP:G12 - there is no evidence of permission for this image and obviously this image was mislicensed. Warned the user as well. Aasim (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burakdeniz12332.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Burakdeniz12332.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Hfjyjhj ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Source is unclear, but it's a widely available photo (see https://twitter.com/i_sanam_/status/1320941905031483398 for example), unlikely to be the uploader's work. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Definitely not free. A reverse image search says that the image looks like a Turkish actor Burak Deniz.  Cannot find the original source so cannot tag with g12. Aasim (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VS Code (Insiders).png
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Changed license to. @Awesome Aasim: Typically this doesn't require a discussion, if something is broken, just fix it :) - F ASTILY   02:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:VS Code (Insiders).png">File:VS Code (Insiders).png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by KamranMackey ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The Microsoft permissions grant states that we 'may not use screenshots of Microsoft product boot-up screens, opening screens, "splash screens," or screens from beta release products or other products that have not been commercially released.' Because this screenshot is from an insider's build, it makes the non-free Microsoft screenshot tag pretty much ineligible. I'd suggest relicense to non-free software screenshot or replace the image with a screenshot from a stable build. Another thing that could potentially be done is download the source code for the current version of VS code, compile the code themselves, then upload the result under the MIT license, though it may still not be legally okay because the binaries are freeware. Aasim (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.