Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 September 28



File:Big Time.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Big Time.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Wikipedical ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The fonts on this file, background colours etc. strike me as a little too complicated for the file to be in the public domain. C.f commons:Commons:Threshold of originality in particular the American Airlines logo item. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alice de Janzé.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Resolved - F ASTILY   18:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Alice de Janzé.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Xanthi22 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is a freely licenced photo on the subject at Commons under this same name, but I am a little uneasy on the licence of the Commons file which I've marked for deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The Commons file has been deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Zaslav leaning on railing.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:David Zaslav leaning on railing.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Sarjmarj ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder but this claim is not credible. The provided source states "Taken on my phone on vacation", but that is contradicted by the EXIF. The Canon EOS-1D X is assuredly not a phone. The EXIF also credits author Victor Hugo who is a photographer with the Patrick McMullan Company which is listed as the copyright holder. Note that this editor previously lied about being the copyright holder for File:David Zaslav with glasses.jpg. See this. Whpq (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:S-13 tzur01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:S-13 tzur01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Flayer ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Apparently the same image exists at Commons under the same name, a free licence and higher resolution. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was later released by IDF under OTRS. Speedy deletion, I'd say. Flayer (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Francisque Gay.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: I've nominated the files on Commons for deletion, given their dubious copyright status. I've moved enwp's file to File:Francisque Gay headshot.png to avoid naming conflicts with Commons. - F ASTILY   02:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Francisque Gay.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Aymatth2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

has uploaded a file on Commons on the same subject as this one (which would thus fail WP:NFCC) but with no explanation of the licence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This file and the ones uploaded to Commons all seem to have been made around 1948–49, when the subject was ambassador to Canada. I am a bit suspicious about the claim that they are anonymous. They look like official photos or press clippings to me, where the author may well be known. If the author is known, and they are not crown copyright, they might well be protected. E.g. 30-year old photographer, died in 1988 aged 70, protected until 2038. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello. As you can see, , , , , there are no indications about authors' names. --Guise (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The images in commons:Category:Francisque Gay come from eBay. The vendor does not give the author's name, but that does not mean the author is unknown. They photographs seem to be professional quality. If they were taken for a news agency, the agency may well have recorded the names of the photographers, and the photographs may be protected by copyright. They are far too recent for PD-old-assumed to apply. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.