Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 September 29



File:California Deluxe - Blink-182.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:California Deluxe - Blink-182.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Statik N ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Does not serve critical or educational purpose. Very similar to the standard edition; but, just color swapped. I have seen multiple "deluxe" edition artwork being taken down for the same reason and I believe this artwork meets that same reasoning. 101.166.8.57 (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I disagree. It's an album cover for the deluxe edition which was an important part of the album. Statik N (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * What about such pages like Run the Jewels (album), D-Sides, and Emotion (Carly Rae Jepsen album), or even the previous Blink-182 album Neighborhoods, among many others that have different deluxe edition covers? A lot of pages lack the use of deluxe or alternate covers, as they do not bring any additional information, which can be clearly defined on the page. --2001:8003:32A5:7700:E8FB:129E:F57A:E344 (talk) 02:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree and support that it should be removed per given reasons. ❂ string    DTD  ❂ 02:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I support on removal and agree that it doesn't brings too much to the table, being able to be described on the article. R2me2 (talk) 09:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evelyn knight portrait.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Evelyn knight portrait.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Knightfamily ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

dubious licensing Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evelyn knight performs.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Evelyn knight performs.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Knightfamily ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

dubious licensing Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evelyn knight &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Evelyn knight & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Knightfamily ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

dubious licensing Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.