Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 April 25



File:Assault Craft Unit ONE Medals 2013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Assault Craft Unit ONE Medals 2013.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Team4Technologies ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Insufficient information to verify the copyright status of this photo. There is a PD-USGov tag, but I am assuming the uploader used the tag to refer to the depiction in the photograph, rather than the photograph itself, there is no evidence to suggest that the photograph was also taken by a Federal government employee in their duties or that the photograph is freely licensed. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a license tag for their photo. Dylsss(talk contribs) 14:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , I mailed the uploader about this. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, all. I am the photographer of the image and although I am in the military, I did not take the picture in any formal capacity.  I'm not sure how to tag this in the appropriate manner, but I claim no copyright on it and wish to have it used freely. - Team4Technologies 08:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , could you please tag it CC0? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , complete. - Team4Technologies 05:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep is now CC0. should we also indicate the license for the depicted sign? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zombie Economics - John Quiggins.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Zombie Economics - John Quiggins.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Russbill ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I like it, but I don't think it meets WP:NFCC? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlamedaNavalHospital.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:AlamedaNavalHospital.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Telecineguy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Apologies if I am missing something, but I do not see how this is a US army photo. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.