Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 August 6



File:Motorola Wings Advert 1999.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Motorola Wings Advert 1999.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bylandandsea ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free advertisement is stated to be used to support the advertising campaign for the Motorola phone. There is no significant sourced commentary about the advertising. In fact, there's no mention of the advertising at all aside from the image caption. Fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 02:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exodus Collective - Exodus from Babylon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Exodus Collective - Exodus from Babylon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bylandandsea ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free screenshot from a documentary stated to illustrate the outdoor party and the documentary about the collective. There is no significant sourced commentary about this image and its removal would not detract from a reader's understanding of the party. As for the documentary, it is simply a bullet point in the popular culture section and its presence does not aid in a user's understanding of the topic. Fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 02:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love Train - O&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on.  MBisanz  talk 19:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * File:Love Train - O& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nigel Hess.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Nigel Hess.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Nigelhess ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Dubious own-work claim. The uploader is the subject depicted in this photo, and uncropped versions found on other websites (like here) indicate that this is a not a self-taken photo. Requires WP:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗ plicit  05:28, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Original uncropped photo found on . I'm guessing the photographer is Nick Telford given the similarities in this photo and the photo taken here  --Elephanthunter (talk) 04:56, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mao Statue at Zhong Shan Guang Chang.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator. ✗ plicit  14:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Mao Statue at Zhong Shan Guang Chang.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Noel Hanna ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Flickr file no longer accessible today. A search at Archive.org reveals only one result, and the archived page indicates the file licensing as "All Rights Reserved" (thereby unsuitable for Commons despite that the country has sufficient exceptions for public-space works). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Photo uploaded by the original photographer. --Elephanthunter (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * are you sure? The archived copy does not indicate the real name of the Flickr uploader. Commons is strict in verifying files. Note that this cannot be kept here because it violates no FOP for sculptures in the United States, which means it must be sent to Commons immediately (if there is a tangible proof that both the uploader and Flickr photographer is the same person). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Looks that way. There's a Linkedin "Noël Hanna" who was an English teacher in Shenyang only during the year of 2004. Matches up with this 2004 photo of a Shenyang statue uploaded by "Noel Hanna" with a Flicker comment "I missed the English students! It was just down the street from my hotel so I visited it a few times." and part of the album "One year in China". --Elephanthunter (talk) 07:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * if that is so, then ❌. Perhaps this can be moved there, but a link to this discussion must be posted on the description page of the file after its move there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr Selavy London.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Dr Selavy London.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Devushkao ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

appears to be a promotional image for a play, dubious self-work claim  F ASTILY   21:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.