Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 June 14



File:T. P. Ashrafali in a protest against CAA-NRC.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * File:T. P. Ashrafali in a protest against CAA-NRC.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Heminvv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

uploader states "T. P. Asharafali published this image in his Facebook profile" on the file description page, but also claims own work. Unless the uploader is also T. P. Asharafali (unlikely), then this is probably a copyright violation. At the minimum, permission (via VTRS) is needed to keep this image  F ASTILY   03:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - claim of own work is likely invalid, file would not meet NFCC if converted to fair use, so this cannot be kept. Hog Farm Talk 20:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. The EXIF data indicates this likely comes from Facebook, but Facebook's general licensing isn't really compatible with WP:COPY or c:COM:L. If the uploader is the Facebook account holder and added a acceptable free license to the photo, then perhaps that would be OK; I say perhaps, however, there would still need to something confirming that the uploader is the copyright holder and just wasn't uploading someone else's work per c:COM:LL. I think this probably could've been tagged with npd, but it's hear now and perhaps the uploader will clarify the provenance. The "own work" claim could just be a mistake as is often the case, but WP:CONSENT needs to be verified regardless and the way to do that would be to send an email to Wikimedia VTRS. In addition, per Hog Farm, there seems to be no way to use re-licenses this as non-free content given the way it's currenlty being used and the lack of clarity about it's provenance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Concord Regional Airport Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Concord Regional Airport Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by AirportExpert ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Originally uploaded as non-free content, but subsequently converted to PD-logo per WP:MCQ. A clean svg version was created over at Commons per the request made at c:COM:GL/I and has replaced this jpg version in the main infobox of Concord Regional Airport. The jpg was tagged with Now Commons, but speedy deletion doesn't apply because of the difference in file format. So, bringing the file here for discussion as suggested here. There seems to be no reason to keep this local version since any possible use of it should be covered by the svg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vixens omorashi.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Vixens omorashi.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Fsecret ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCCP #8. Not used for "critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents", and does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic.  Sandstein  21:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. It might be possible for the cover art of the first issue of the manga, or either the video or dvd box cover art or the OVA that was subsequently released in main infobox of an article such as this, but not a screenshot like this. A screenshot could possibly used in the body of the article if it was the subject of sourced critical commentary about some aspect of the animation technique or themes the animation is based upon, but it would need to be much more substantial than the simple statement "It contains three episodes and contains the use of BDSM and Omorashi" and a infobox caption stating basically the same even if properly sourced. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.