Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 May 21



File:Mubarakal-Kabir computer rendition.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Mubarakal-Kabir computer rendition.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ktr101 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image is s representation of an infrastructure project which is being completed in phases. Since the time when the image was added, portions of the project have been completed so there is the possibility to take a photo of elements of this project. Fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 01:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derek Chauvin mugshot April 2021.webp

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit  12:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Derek Chauvin mugshot April 2021.webp ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

WP:NFC #1 disallows the use of non-free pictures of living people. ― Tartan357  Talk 03:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Per WP:NFCI and WP:FREER. This mugshot is an exception due to the chances of a free alternative being found or created highly unlikely, as the subject of the photograph is currently imprisoned at a Supermax prison awaiting sentencing for up to 75 years in prison with the possibility of more time from aggravating factors, making the legal ability for photographers to take a free photograph of him in court or in prison extremely sparse and almost impossible. And this mugshot is also historically significant and iconic to his article. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 11:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep there is consensus for living people who are incarcerated, because there is no free access to them. This general exception (along with the two other: fugitives and recluses) should be written in the guideline to prevent nominations like this. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't think there's anything iconic of historic about this image at all; it's a mug shot and trying to argue that somehow that makes its "iconic" is incorrect for the reasons given in WP:ITSHISTORIC. The FREER argument, however, does have some merit since it is true that non-free images of long-term incarcerated individuals are allowed because it's assumed that it will be nearly impossible to find or create a free equivalent of them to serve the same purpose as a non-free one. The problem with that approach sometimes though is that it assumes that a free equivalent image must only be a newly created image, but "free equivalent" could also mean an existing image as well. Chauvin still hasn't been formally sentenced (that's scheduled for sometime around June 15, 2021) and will appear in court again; so, it still seem possible that a free image might be possible. I think this was uploaded in good faith, but there's no indication given as to what if any atttempt was made to find a free equivalent, and it might have been better to wait until at least all of the relevant court proceedings had completed. Maybe this is nitpicking in a sense, but given that a number of non-free images previously uploaded of Chauvin end up deleted for various reasons, it might be best to make sure (as best as we can) that FREER is being met. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I did some research for a free alternative before I uploaded the mugshot. I got a poor feedback of results of images looking through flickr and using google search tools. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is no possibility of a free picture given he is in jail. In this case my interpretation of WP:NFC#UUI #1 is the opposite to the noms. Desertarun (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keyshia Cole Love.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Keyshia Cole Love.ogg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Tease Pillar ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Too lengthy. This sample is 46 seconds long. The guideline at Manual of Style/Music samples says that non-free listening samples should be 10% of the song or 30 seconds, whichever is shorter. Since the song is 4:15 long, the sample should be 25 seconds long. Binksternet (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hurstpierpoint High Street Lyndsey Smith.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Hurstpierpoint High Street Lyndsey Smith.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Toby Lott ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Rationale is unclear; there is a photograph of the building in the article, and this painting appears to lack contextual significance. Peter James (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2018-10-19 Cementerio de la Recoleta, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Martin Rulsch) 16.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:2018-10-19 Cementerio de la Recoleta, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Martin Rulsch) 16.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by DerHexer ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

this file is not appropriate for the Recoleta Cemetery Category - it does not depict any recognisable structure nor part of the Cemetery - it is a portrait of a person who could be anywhere Seauton (talk) 23:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.