Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 November 22



Borderline (Madonna song) cover arts

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep File:Madonna - Borderline (US 7-inch single).png - F ASTILY   00:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Madonna - Borderline (US 7-inch single).png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Chrishm21 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * File:Borderline by Madonna European artwork.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by George Ho ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I uploaded the US 7-inch vinyl release under originally JPEG format to replace the European artwork (JPEG version) in 2013. Then the PNG version of the same US release took over in 2017; I haven't minded the change. This year, the change to the European artwork occurred. I had the image reverted back to what the image was and then uploaded the European artwork separately. Then I'm listing both cover arts here.

The song "Borderline" was recorded in the US by the American singer Madonna. Sure, Madonna's a global icon, but she and the song are American. Furthermore, American music industry has been influential and has had its own share of customers in its region. If keeping both is not aligned/compliant with WP:NFCC, then one of them should be kept; the other, deleted. Preferably, the US 7-inch single release should be kept (primarily) to represent her, the industry, and the American customers. However, I can see others voting for the European artwork, especially if her influence on Europe matters more. Alternatively, both cover arts can be kept by default if there's no agreement on what to do with them. George Ho (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christopher Renz.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Christopher Renz.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mbochart ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

tagged VRT (OTRS) received for 3 months. Upon reviewing the associated VRT ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed  F ASTILY   08:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dead Actorism emparchment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Dead Actorism emparchment.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Hunterd ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I'm not even sure what this is exactly? It's only used on User:Hunterd/DeadActorism/HolyEmparchment which doesn't explain it either. Does it have educational value? The claim This file is copyright the OneCone community, however I (on behalf of OneCone community, being a member of it for several years) have released all the rights. seems problematic. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dalmatinac 1957 Robinson Cup Winners.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Dalmatinac 1957 Robinson Cup Winners.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Maestrale ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No indication whether the actual banner is in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thai Constitution Defense Monument Removal 2016.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Thai Constitution Defense Monument Removal 2016.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by ILikelargeFries ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image that is used to illustrate text about the removal of the Constitution Defense Monument. The removal is adequately described with text so fails WP:NFCC. the image itself is not the subject of any significant sourced commentary nor would its removal destract from the understanding of the article, so fails WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dark Days Inside the Light While Drunk on Wine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:Dark Days Inside the Light While Drunk on Wine.jpg">File:Dark Days Inside the Light While Drunk on Wine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Joseph Barker ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused book cover, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daisy Buchanan.png
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Daisy Buchanan.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Informant16 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is used on the page Daisy Buchanan and is of an actress portraying the role. The non-free rationale for use states that no free replacement can be found. However, there have since been two images in the article of actresses who have portrayed the character from the public domain(one and two. -- <b style="color:white">Mike</b> <b style="color:white">🗩</b> 21:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - the stated purpose in the NFUR of illustrating the character fails WP:NFCC as noted in the nomination. The image itself is not needed to understand the article nor is it the subject of significant sourced commentary so I see no way that the NFUR could be modified so that the image could be used.  Whpq (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.