Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 April 8



File:File-WikiProject Medicine - Dermatology task force - Articles created.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No consensus - F ASTILY   02:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:File-WikiProject Medicine - Dermatology task force - Articles created.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Anomie ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The page using this file, WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force/Articles created, has not been updated since 2015 and the bot stopped uploading new versions of this file monthly since February 2022, so there is no point in having this file any further with including months after December 2015 in the image. It should therefore be deleted partially deleted (February 2016 to January 2022) reverted to the January 2016 version. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural oppose This nomination does not seem to provide any valid rationale for deletion. The image is admittedly still used, if only in an old page. "Not being updated" on its own is not a reason for deletion. Anomie⚔ 11:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Then, do not delete the image page itself altogether. Instead, just revert the image to the 1 January 2016 version and keep the older versions but delete all the newer versions from February 2016 to January 2022. Since the project page has not been updated since 2015, the monthly upload should have been stopped years ago. There is no point in uploading a 1 February 2016 version if the page has not been updated in January 2016 anyway. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * There's still no point to that. It's not like it saves server space or anything. Anomie⚔ 19:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I tried proposing complete deletion, but that failed. Then, I tried proposing partial deletion of February 2016 to January 2022, but that also failed. So, now I propose that the file merely be reverted to the January 2016 version without deleting any older or new versions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Why do anything to it? If the project wants something done with it, they can do it. Anomie⚔ 22:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Antonio Blue Book.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted jpg version as the png version is higher quality/contains fewer artifacts, as suggested by Ixfd64. - F ASTILY   00:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:San Antonio Blue Book.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mcorazao ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:San Antonio Blue Book.JPG. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The PNG file is actually somewhat superior because the JPG version has some compression artifacts. However, I found a version here with higher resolution and original colors, that could be used as a replacement for both. We could upload that one to Commons under . Ixfd64 (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nintendo DSi Home Menu.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No consensus - F ASTILY   02:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Nintendo DSi Home Menu.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Newfiebluejay ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It has a weak rationale. Fails WP:NFCCP#8. Sourced text adequately describes this image.


 * Image description: The top display shows photos taken using Nintendo DSi Camera, the bottom display shows apps and games on the system as selectable icons.
 * Its use at Nintendo DSi system software: "The DSi's user interface is a single row of icons which can be navigated by sliding the stylus across them."
 * Its use at Nintendo DSi: Like the Wii, the DSi has upgradeable firmware, and features a menu interface that displays applications as selectable icons. [...] Icons are set in a single-row grid navigable with the stylus or D-pad, and may be re-arranged via drag-and-drop.

« Ryūkotsusei » 16:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Does not justify AfD. TheSecondComing10 (talk) 03:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Text could describe plenty of images, but that alone is not a reason to delete them. All other system software articles have similar images. Being sized at low resolution, it falls under fair use. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It boils down to adequacy for this specific image as further explained here: WP:FREER. It looks basic enough to satisfy point A or B. Hope this helps. « Ryūkotsusei »  14:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Could say the same about things like the desktop in Windows 11, but it has some level of artistic layout that cannot be perfectly described by text.
 * Either way, starting with a single picture is not proper Wikipedia policy. If you believe this is the case it should be discussed on an all or nothing basis as it is clearly policy to allow fair use images of user interfaces even when they are fairly basic. Procedural oppose. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * NFCC #8 is too subjective and can be applied broadly. "Detrimental" and "significantly" cannot be measured. Since the English wiki allows non-free, it is to be assumed these types of images are allowed. « Ryūkotsusei » 13:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Askam and Ireleth-Askam school sign-17.12.06.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Askam and Ireleth-Askam school sign-17.12.06.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by J Milburn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United Kingdom, which also has a low threshold of originality. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BC Flag from BC Research at Azure Dynamics.JPG
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:BC Flag from BC Research at Azure Dynamics.JPG">File:BC Flag from BC Research at Azure Dynamics.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Vancouver2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Generally no freedom of panorama for indoor exhibitions. We need to know the copyright status of each of the original images. I don't believe this qualifies for fair use because the article has no commentary about the pictured photographs. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sambalpur-logo.JPG
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Sambalpur-logo.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Akkida ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Complex logo, dubious claim of own work due to low quality and resolution. Used only on user page. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.