Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 31



File:Sheet from &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator, who proposed that this be relicensed as PD but changed their mind. Nobody else is supportive of the proposal so far, or suggested to take a different action. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Sheet from & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Wmpearl ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Does this really meet the treshold of originality needed for copyright protection? It seems like PD-simple for me, and if the design is free then the photograph can't be non-free, right? Jonteemil (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Jonteemil, I doubt this much more. As Richard Tuttle says, "Each sheet consisting of a few strokes on low-grade loose leaf paper. The paints bleed and pooled, causing the paper to buckle, giving the works three-dimensionality." So the paper being buckled is intentional and part of the work. And if the work is indeed three-dimensional that means there are several other considerations for derivative works as well. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:25, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * As a note, even "simple" paintings are often copyrighted due to details that may not be immediately obvious. See c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/10 Ixfd64 (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Intresting, good find. I guess I'm leaning on keeping as non-free based on the previous discussion. Perhaps a template should be created for files whose motives doesn't meet the TOO but the art behind it might.Jonteemil (talk) 22:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chenghai02.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Chenghai02.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ibang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chenghai01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Chenghai01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ibang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.