Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 4



File:2022 Maurice Revello Tournament poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. A rationale for fairly using the logos in the poster (to identify participant teams) was found. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * File:2022 Maurice Revello Tournament poster.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Pnslotero ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid fair use, as it's not the logo of the event, but is a poster which includes 12 other team logos, all of which are presumably copyrighted. If the tournament had a specific logo, then this should be uploaded and used instead (as a valid fair use), otherwise this should be deleted and not replaced with any other image Joseph2302 (talk) 14:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I notice that other seasons of this tournament have similar posters on their articles, but that isn't a valid reason to keep this one- in fact, I believe it's a reason to delete them too. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The FUR seems to be a good-faith attempt to choose what would be most appropriate. I wouldn't fault them for that. Likewise, you presume that the logos in question are in fact copyrighted, but have provided no evidence. Please keep me apprised if you nominate future posters as I'd like to see where it goes. Buffs (talk) 02:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Logos, along with everything else, should be assumed copyrighted unless it's explicitly clear that they are not. So for each of the 12 team logos, the copyright belongs to the associated football association (e.g. French Football Federation for France), and using the logo on the 2022 Maurice Revello Tournament article is not a valid fair use for that logo. If there were a poster without the copyrighted team logos, then it wouldn't be as much of a problem. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep The official poster makes sense as a lead image. If a single logo were available, it would be more appropriate. As one does not exist, the official poster for the tournament is as sufficient and appropriate as the movie poster for Top Gun: Maverick as the lead image (just an example, though you could certainly use any movie for a similar example). The fact that certain logos are incorporated is not relevant unless public domain is being asserted (it isn't). Buffs (talk) 02:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a poster for this specific event, and as an item used to advertise the event, it fits the purpose of visual identification for the article about this year's instance of the tournament. I have fixed the copyright tag to identify this as a poster and not a symbol. -- Whpq (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It includes copyrighted team logos though, and this article isn't a valid fair use of the team's logos. Joseph<b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The poster as a whole incorporates these logos as part of the branding for the entire tournament identifying these teams as participants. That does not violate WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 17:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barry Mitchell WHITE TEETH GRIN at anchor desk 10-24-2021.jpeg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Once again, Explicit deleted the file citing the consensus in this discussion but forgot to actually close the discussion. Apparently, Explicit was relying AnomieBOT to close this for them, but this time it was late. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:Barry Mitchell WHITE TEETH GRIN at anchor desk 10-24-2021.jpeg">File:Barry Mitchell WHITE TEETH GRIN at anchor desk 10-24-2021.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Xspace ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Asserted to be own work, but this look like a publicity photo. It has appeared as part of a collage of publicity photos. VRT confirmation would be required. Whpq (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio without evidence uploader owns the copyright. Buffs (talk) 02:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as seemingly not the uploader's work. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.