Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 10



File:Paul Zak web size1.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Paul Zak web size1.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Zakp ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Purported SVG of a photo which doesn't render. Seloloving (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 11:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Winter waterspout.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Winter waterspout.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Inks.LWC ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

While I accept that there an image of this particular snowspout could not be replaced, an image of a snowspout is, in principle, replaceable. While these events are rare, they aren't unheard of. The use of this non-free image is thus not justified. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The provided source for the image is NOAA which gives rise to the possibility that the image might be PD. The site would not respond when I tried it, but this archive indicates the photo is from Environment Canada, and does not allow commercial use.  As noted by the nominator, a free image could be created. -- Whpq (talk) 12:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rarest Photo of Sta. Lucia East Grand Mall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Rarest Photo of Sta. Lucia East Grand Mall.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by NeilvsJ ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid fair use claim. The building still exists. Anyone can take photos of it and upload locally on English Wikipedia, as long as our copyright law does not grant commercial exploitations of copyrighted public works and arts like architectural works permanently installed or fixed in public spaces, without architects', sculptors', or muralists' licensing permissions. Delete this fair use file as WP:CSD. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - As noted by the nomiantor, this fails WP:NFCC. The stated purpose is "primary means of visual identification", but that is being done with File:Sta. Lucia Mall Logo.jpg so it also fails WP:NFCC. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Il CENTRO Mall Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Il CENTRO Mall Logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by NeilvsJ ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This logo is claimed to be used for " primary means of visual identification" for Sta. Lucia East Grand Mall, but this is the logo for the 4th phase of the mall, and not the logo of the mall itself which is File:Sta. Lucia Mall Logo.jpg. Fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. Whpq (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tahmasbi Saki Foundation logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Tahmasbi Saki Foundation logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Amir8797 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused logo possibly above the threshold of originality. Source website states "All rights reserved." Ixfd64 (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.