Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 17



File:Nanhua.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Nanhua.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Shannon1 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fair use rationale: "No public domain images of this dam are known to exist." Any reason in particular nobody could go over there and take a picture? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhilAnselmo1988.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:PhilAnselmo1988.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by ExcitiveStan3680 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a non-free image of a living person. If used purely for identification as stated, then it fails WP:NFCC, as the article on Phil Anselmo contains many freely licensed images already. There is a note in the minmal use field of the non-free usage rationale stating "It only represents Philip Anselmo during the Glam Metal era." The article does not provide any significant sourced critical commentary about Anselmo's Glam metal era look so it also fails WP:NFCC if this is an alternative purpose. Whpq (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * this image should be kept imo as it shows Anselmo in his early days before his style drastically changed, so it would add a lot to the article --FMSky (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * How is WP:NFCC satisified? Anselmo's appearance is not discussed at all in the article. Whpq (talk) 12:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:NFC, "For some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance..." (emphasis mine). Without discussion of the subject's appearance, NFCC is not met. ✗  plicit  00:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MN StateParkMap.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * File:MN StateParkMap.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Yanktonranger ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I don't believe a map like this qualifies for fair use because we can easily make our own. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The image certainly does not exceed the resolution standards for fair use; it is of such low resolution that it is illegible and essentially unusable. I agree that a clever person could make a suitable image (perhaps using the coordinates in the respective articles on the parks). But we need to find that person. Kablammo (talk) 12:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * There is an existing unlabeled image on List of Minnesota state parks; given the number of parks it would be difficult to add legible labels to any image usable in a wikipedia article. Kablammo (talk) 12:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - A free map is obviously possible so fails WP:NFCC. -- Whpq (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.