Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 October 5



File:Caio Duilio cruiser 1963.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Caio Duilio cruiser 1963.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Attilios ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The source of the image provides very little description of the image itself; year of publication is not provided, neither is the year of creation. Both factors are required for the image to stand on Commons, even if it is out of copyright. There are other definitely-public domain images on Commons that can be used in place of this image. Sennecaster ( Chat ) 02:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cssalabama ghost.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Cssalabama ghost.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Grayghost01 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low-quality user gallery decoration of an inactive user. Dronebogus (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And likely copyright issue, since the ship image is not attributed and is clearly NOT by the uploader. Delete. BusterD (talk) 07:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Beside the obvious copyright issue, the image is of too low quality to be of any educational use. No value at all. —Sundostund (talk) 08:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no obvious use outside of userspace, and per BusterD and the copyright issue. Hog Farm Talk 13:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rahil1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 11:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Rahil1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rahilhushye ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Rahil2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rahilhushye ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Rahil3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rahilhushye ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned user photos, the last surviving contributions by the uploader. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗ plicit  06:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:WEBHOST. – The Grid  ( talk )  15:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RainbowBriteDoll.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Hog Farm Talk 17:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:RainbowBriteDoll.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Jlencion ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

c:COM:TOYS. ✗ plicit  07:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Either delete or convert to NFCC; Rainbow Brite is unillustrated entirely. Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 22:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Aside from the issue of this being a photo of a copyrightable doll, the actual free license applied is incorrect. See this archive which shows the licensing is CC-BY-NC-SA.  It's not a very good image for illustrating the doll either so I am not in favour of conversion to non-free. -- Whpq (talk) 13:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tjj graphic.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Tjj graphic.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Grayghost01 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Badly edited… quasi-religious icon version I guess? of an existing, better PD image. Not educational and inaccurate authorship (photographer uncredited and MS-paint level edits adding simple geometry are not above the threshold of originality). Dronebogus (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused and unusable. BusterD (talk) 21:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dubious copyright status, too low quality to be of any educational value or worth. As the nominator pointed out, this is an obvious quasi-religious icon version of File:Stonewall Jackson.jpg, and very poorly edited on top of that. —Sundostund (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licensing can be corrected to PD so that is an issue that does not require deletion. The image is also in use and given Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Grayghost01/image gallery, I see no good reason for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 12:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ta graphic.png
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Ta graphic.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Grayghost01 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Another bad, useless edit of good PD art. Dronebogus (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused and unusable. BusterD (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dubious copyright status, too low quality to be of any educational value or worth. —Sundostund (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per . The sad part is that in 2020, I remember commenting that its use in Template:Frederick County, Virginia in the American Civil War was inappropriate. Hog Farm Talk 13:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licensing can be corrected to PD so that is an issue that does not require deletion. The image is also in use and given Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Grayghost01/image gallery, I see no good reason for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 12:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jsm graphic.png
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Jsm graphic.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Grayghost01 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Another bad, uncredited, educationally useless edit of great PD material. Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unused and unusable. BusterD (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dubious copyright status, too low quality to be of any educational value or worth. —Sundostund (talk) 01:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licensing can be corrected to PD so that is an issue that does not require deletion. The image is also in use and given Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Grayghost01/image gallery, I see no good reason for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:No shower in the stone.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 17:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:No shower in the stone.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Razor Lather Mirror Crossed ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Dubious copyright claim; was posted to another website prior to the upload to Wikipedia. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NRMCB low res cover.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:NRMCB low res cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Clifflandis ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File has been replaced on the article Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, so it is no longer needed. Clifflandis (talk) 18:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.