Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 October 7



File:WarioLandLogo 3.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:WarioLandLogo 3.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Nikotapp ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

likely non-free, the texturing of the logo pushes it over both US TOO and Japanese TOO. Cannot be converted to non-free without failing WP:NFCC, as it is being used decoratively  F ASTILY   21:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's surprising that this file last so long and wasn't deleted per WP:F4 since it never seems to have had a copyright license. It might be OK to convert to non-free logo but that depends on how you want to interpret WP:NFC in this case. For some genres of articles, it's often considered "more" encyclopedic to keep everything in the same place; for example, instead of creating stand-alone articles about each cover version of a song, it's considered "better" encyclopedically to cover them all in the same article about the original version of the song. The same things also sometimes seems to be done for articles about book series or articles about film music series. Whether a similar rationale works in the case of Wario (series) probably needs to be further discussed since I agree with Fastily in that this is probably too complex to be considered a simple wordmark and thus be PD-logo or even PD-ineligible-USonly. I will add that if the consensus is that this needs to be non-free, but that it's current use isn't policy compliant, then the non-free use of File:WarioWare logo.png should also be discussed as well because it's clearly non-free but it's being used in the same manner as this file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - the image is too complex to be PD, and its current usage does not justify conversion to non-free use. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emblem of Saigon.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. No valid deletion rationale provided. ✗ plicit  23:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Emblem of Saigon.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Hwi.padam ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image with excessively high resolution. Not sure whether such non-free logos are allowed to be uploaded in .svg format, in which they can be zoomed freely. Không hề giả trân (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Non-free SVG logos are fine. We have a SVG-Logo tag that can be used for either free or non-free logos. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.