Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 April 16

 &lt; April 15 April 17 &gt;

File:JUICE insignia.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete as orphaned. Restoration request can be made at WP:REFUND. ✗ plicit  23:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:JUICE insignia.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by PhilipTerryGraham ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I found a high-resolution freely licensed image containing the logo, although in different colors. Would it make sense to extract the logo from that image and use it in the article instead? Ixfd64 (talk) 00:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * replaced with extracted logo from CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO file, see File:JUICE mission insignia.png. Artem.G (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * This photo was uploaded by a person pictured within the photo, who then gives all the permissions and such, but a person pictured within a photo is not the copyright holder for an image (the photographer is) unless the creator of the photograph signs over such rights: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brian_Engler-Dave_Barry_%26_The_Fairfax_Prize-Close-up_9-22-2013.JPG This is clearly not a "selfie" since the left-side subject's hands could not be holding the camera taking the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.184.201.108 (talk) 06:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That indeed looks like a copyright violation. However, the image is on Commons, so you'll have to nominate it for deletion there. In the future, please start a new discussion instead of "hijacking" an FfD for another file. Thanks. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JAC Motors logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep as moot. The issue has been addressed. ✗ plicit  23:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:JAC Motors logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by HapHaxion ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The logo as it currently stands is an inaccurate representation of the source,. How did this get so badly borked? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CITV logo 2006.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Status quo, no action - F ASTILY   00:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:CITV logo 2006.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Wotnochips ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Tagged as PD-ineligible-USonly on the basis that it's a triangle, a letter and a logo. I'd argue that putting those three items together requires creative input, especially as the letter is hand-drawn. There's just slightly too much going on here to make it public domain. That said, there's a fair use argument that could be made, although possibly not as the image is currently being used. — Trey Maturin™ 17:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep as is. This is a simple geometric shape and basic text. Well below the threshold of originality per c:COM:TOO US. ✗  plicit  23:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.