Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 April 5

 &lt; April 4 April 6 &gt;

File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by AkshayAnand ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC, as it is replaceable with the public domain logo File:Delhi Capitals Logo.png. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Duccio ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

We already have a licensed image of the engine, and the article does not have any significant commentary about test firings. Therefore, I don't believe this image qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Transparent.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Euclid Transparent.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ultimograph5 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Likely doesn't qualify for fair use anymore as free alternatives have been made available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Pippo skaio ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I don't think we really need a non-free image of a model when high-quality artist's renderings are freely available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment it is an engineering model, meaning a full scale replica with parts replicated to as close to flight hardware as fidelity is needed to test. So many times, these are copies of the flight hardware and can be used as spare parts, so not a render but a duplication of the real thing. Thus this would be more real than any artwork. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.