Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 July 10

 &lt; July 9 July 11 &gt;

File:Amhara zones.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Amhara zones.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Sofonias2000100 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Possibly wrong license, image source makes no claims to the license of said image, so it cannot be assumed it’s in the Public Domain. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port Dock Station Impression.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Port Dock Station Impression.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cityedit14 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Delete. File is uploaded with the incorrect licencing. A new file with the correct licence has already been uploaded seperate to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityedit14 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment a FFD notice should have been added to the file when nominated- this was not done, but I have now corrected this. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indirect direct lighting 2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Indirect direct lighting 2.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Retaildesigner ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, blurry image. Better interior photos available in c:Category:Meijer stores in Michigan. ✗ plicit  02:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, not a useful image when better images exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earl R. Dean standing with the johnny bull machine.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:Earl R. Dean standing with the johnny bull machine.jpg">File:Earl R. Dean standing with the johnny bull machine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Gavinmacqueen ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC, as the image of this person and machine does not significantly enhance the article- the article section is about the "Contour bottle design", and we have numerous free photos of the bottles (and so this arguably fails WP:NFCC). The NFCC#8 is blatantly incorrect in saying that this article is for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of their biographical article, which is clearly incorrect for current use. The image might be a fair use on a biography of Earl R. Dean, but not on the Coca-Cola article. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A HAL Tejas.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * File:A HAL Tejas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kolkata class ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is claimed to be "own work" but it's really cropped from the same source as c:File:Two HAL Tejas flying in formation.jpg. Although the image could be relicensed, and transferred to Commons, this image is not used, and is very similar to the higher quality crop c:File:Two HAL Tejas flying in formation (cropped).jpg. Given that the image is redundant, it should be deleted. Whpq (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Callichila plagigera.jpeg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Callichila plagigera.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Celloc85 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

According to the source, the file is licensed CC BY 4.0, not CC0 1.0 Notrealname1234 (talk) 21:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Relicense to CC-BY 4.0. -- Whpq (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.