Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 30

 &lt; March 29 March 31 &gt;

File:‘Katie’ talkshow still (October 31st, 2012).jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * File:‘Katie’ talkshow still (October 31st, 2012).jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by 4theloveofallthings ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Living people. No apparent need to show that John Mateer appeared on the "Katie" talkshow. Fails NFCC7. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, no nonfree use rationale is present at all. The fact that the individual was on the show can be covered adequately by text; an image is unnecessary for that to be made clear. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh wow I don’t know how I forgot to do that. I can do that now? But I guess that does little to change what you have just said about the relevance of the file. I will go ahead and do that regardless! Thanks for the heads up. 4theloveofallthings (talk) 20:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Eh to be honest with you, I see your point. I didn’t really think that one through. I want to do a rationale but I agree with what you just said .. so I am going to have to say delete but also, should I mark the file for speedy deletion since I am the user who contributed it? Or do I let the discussion play out? Genuinely not sure how that works.
 * 4theloveofallthings (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , as you are the uploader of the file, you could, if you like, mark it with db-g7, to request deletion as the author. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Seraphimblade Thanks! I appreciate it. 4theloveofallthings (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mohan Babu University Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Mohan Babu University Logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ravikrishnam ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The griffin artwork is too complex for PD-textlogo, and the source site is marked "©2022 MBU. All Rights Reserved.", so I see no evidence of the claimed public domain status for this logo. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, mislabelled non-free file with no obvious value after the Mohan Babu University article was recently deleted. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * As it is a education related University, the logo is available in many public platforms like social media platforms and news portals to identify the University with the pictorial representation of data, that is very useful for the students and parents for school selection process. And I see the source site is also revised the copyright text on their website. Please don't delete, I'm going to recreate the article with all the guidelines. Thank you. Ravi Krishna Metta (talk) 04:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you recreate an article that is appropriate and not promotional, you could use the logo under the nonfree content criteria; it is essentially always permitted to use an organization's current nonfree logo in an article about that organization. But it is not a public domain image, and you can't inaccurately label as that. "Available to the public" is not the same as "public domain". Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.