Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 November 3

 &lt; November 2 November 4 &gt;

File:Logo Trans Semanggi Suroboyo.svg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No consensus - F ASTILY   09:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Logo Trans Semanggi Suroboyo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Baqotun0023 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Bad self-made vectorization of the logo. The file does not correspond to the fifth point WP:NFCC. — Ирука13 16:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  F ASTILY   01:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , that's a bit harsh. It isn't that bad, and it has to be low-res. It looks fine in its usage, and I wouldn't say it fails WP:NFCC. Contextual significance is another matter, though; I don't see how the logo would . Edward-Woodrow  •  talk  20:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It's worse than the scaled-down original.
 * Here we are creating a high-quality encyclopedia, and all information must be of high quality. Once again, this logo is a poorly executed copy.
 * Were you able to find this image on the specified site in jpg, png, webp or some other resolution? Somewhere else on the Internet? Me not. This image appears only in photographs of buses. As well as two more besides it. Which one is official?
 * By leaving such images you are only pandering to the authors who create low-quality images. — Ирука13 20:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I was able to find the image: https://www.instagram.com/transsemanggisbs.official/ —Alalch E. 17:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ossie Solem.png

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Ossie Solem.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Jweiss11 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Public domain alternative found at File:Ossie Solem photo from 1927 Drake vs Pittsburgh Official Football program.jpg SecretName101 (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by WikiOriginal-9 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Public domain alternative exists at File:Leo Raskowski 1927 (3x4).jpg SecretName101 (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It gets deleted automatically after 7 days or however long it takes the bot to tag it. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.