Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 January 12

 &lt; January 11 January 13 &gt;

File:Disney+ Website.png

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No consensus, leaning keep -Fastily 08:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Disney+ Website.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Evelyn Harthbrooke ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Replaceable with a screenshot of http://disneyplus.com/movies/steamboat-willie/1Lh1k4ammOG5 as Steamboat Willie is now in the public domain. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The main page is preferable in head, though the Steamboat Willie image can be used for the Content library section. Besides, I don’t want public domain abuse. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by public domain abuse? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, feel free to upload a public domain version to Commons, and bring it up on the article's talk page as a possible replacement. If this file becomes orphaned, deleting it is a simple administrative step. But FFD is not a venue for editorial decisions about individual articles (i.e., what is the best way to illustrate the subject of the article). -Pete Forsyth (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree fully with this.★Trekker (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete An image that is only rendered in a collapsed box cannot possibly satisfy WP:NFCC. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Pppery Really? That reasoning appears to contradict existing practice on many of our articles: Reddit, Facebook, Amazon.com, Pinterest, and Discord all have non-free screenshots inside a collapsed box in the infobox. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 18:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? Those images should be deleted too. It's patently contradictory to say that an image is at the same time so unimportant as to render collapsed by default and also so important that its omission would be detrimental to [readers'] understanding. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete reasonable rationale. Hekerui (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - I support the opinion of BaldiBasicsFan. A website is best displayed by an image of its home page. I do think a screenshot of the suggested page would be useful elsewhere in the article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies FUR. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.