Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 16

 &lt; July 15 July 17 &gt;

File:Logo of the Broad Front (Chile, 2024).svg

 * File:Logo of the Broad Front (Chile, 2024).svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by PLATEL ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A free file containing only the title "Frente Amplio" is available on Commons. I don't think this is irreplaceable and the free version should be used instead. As a result this fails NFCC. Bedivere (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


 * A free version of the logo using only letters does exist, and we can use it as an equivalent of this non-free logo in any part of Wikipedia. But in fact, the letters are not the main part of this logo, unlike this circle with a star. And we cannot replace this circle and its contents with a free version. I will draw an analogy with the logo of the Conservative Party (UK), which is similar both in color and in the structure of the logo. There we can also remove the tree from the logo and get a free logo consisting only of text, but this is not an excuse for removing the logo with a tree, which is the main part of the party logo. PLATEL  (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep the non-free as the image part is a distinct identification. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Wishtreesign.JPG

 * File:Wishtreesign.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Slowking4 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I relicensed this as Cc-by-3.0 but reverted my relicensing to the original licensing,  because they thought that there is enough on the sign to be copyrightable. I don't see what on this sign would be above c:COM:TOO US, it's just normal, unstylized text and nothing else. Jonteemil (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It is the quantity of text that is the problem. There are two small paragraphs of text. Enough so that no one would have written that particular text before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, so you are saying that the message itself is what's copyrightable, not the particular reproduction of the message? Would that really be applicable on this work that is just an info sign and not a work of art? That seems far-fetched however I'm no lawyer. Jonteemil (talk) 22:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Dusty Springfield – I Just Don&

 * File:Dusty Springfield – I Just Don& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Jaan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Preferring the other image (File:Just dont know what to do dusty springfield UK vinyl solid centre.png) over one of Dutch releases (45cat) per WP:NFCC. George Ho (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)