Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 March 13

 &lt; March 12 March 14 &gt;

File:JSW Group Headquarters.jpeg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:JSW Group Headquarters.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Eitanb7 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

India has freedom of panorama for buildings (according to e.g. Commons:COM:FOP India). Thus, anyone in the area could take a photo of this building and licence that photo with a Wikipedia-compatible licence. As such, fail WP:NFCC, as a free equivalent could be created. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and because there is insufficient critical commentary (WP:NFCC) to justify use of non-free content. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 17:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom and @Three Sixty, the image fails both of the above named WP:NFCC criteria. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Green-Book-Muammar-Gaddafi-book-cover.jpg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. The cover of the book is PD but the photo is not a faithful 2D representation. Whpq (talk) 03:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:The-Green-Book-Muammar-Gaddafi-book-cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Werldwayd ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The cover consists only of text and should be below the threshold of originality. I'm not sure if PD-art would apply to this photo as the book is a 3D object (and this particular photo is not released under a free license). Otherwise, someone should be able to buy this book and take a free photo of the cover. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep/Move to Public Domain: Upon researching this book, I was not able to find any physical copies of the Arabic version for sale, so I think the image must therefore pass WP:NFCC (replaceability), unless a free image of the cover of the English translation would count as serving the same encyclopedic purpose. Secondly, PD-art does not apply here per the second bullet point of the "When should the PD-Art tag not be used?" section of c:COM:ART, as the image is of the three dimensional book, and not just the 2D cover (perhaps some cropping would remedy this?). Conversely, I do think that the threshold of originality could come into play here, because while Morrissey v. Procter & Gamble set a precedent in US copyright law that: "sufficiently original elements within the work itself can still be eligible for protection.", the Arabic text and geometric shapes found on the Green Books' cover fall below that standard in my opinion, so therefore this image could be moved to the Public Domain. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. As this is not a faithful 2D reproduction, this photo can not be freely licensed without the copyright holder's consent. At least two English-language alternatives exist and can be uploaded to replace this cover. ✗  plicit  23:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kylie Minogue - The Loco-Motion.jpg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Kylie Minogue - The Loco-Motion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by TapLover ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I really have thought one (Australian) cover art is enough to illustrate the Kylie Minogue version. I didn't realize till now that an extra cover art was added. Per NFCC, I can't help wonder a (non-Australian) international cover art is necessary. George Ho (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom, this image fails WP:NFCC, as there is already another non-free image present and serving the same purpose, in the same infobox. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Don&

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:Don&#39;t Dream It&#39;s Over.ogg">File:Don& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rm w a vu ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Currently used in Crowded House (band) and Don't Dream It's Over (song). Not confident that such sample improves understanding of what the band or the song is about, honestly. In other words, not contextually significant to either topic. George Ho (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom, the sample does not enhance the readers' understanding of the song in a way that text alone could not convey. Fails WP:NFCC. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.