Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 March 8

 &lt; March 7 March 9 &gt;

File:Tata WPL Logo.webp

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Tata WPL Logo.webp ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Vestrian24Bio ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not a free logo or a licence compatible with Wikipedia. According to the description, The BCCI allows the free use of its logos according to its protection guidelines in 2021 only if the website is a non-profit organisation, but that is not acceptable as a licence for images on Wikipedia, which requires images to be free for commercial use too Joseph2302 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is a non-profit organization which comes under the given criteria in the BCCI guidelines allowing the use of its logos. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is non-profit, but their licencing system doesn't allow for images with non-commercial licencing only. For images to be stored on Wikipedia, they need to have a licence that allows for both commercial and non-commercial re-use. This is covered at WP:IUPC: Note that images that are licensed for use only on Wikipedia, or only for non-commercial or educational use, or under a license that doesn't allow for the creation of modified/derived works, are unsuitable. This is because images being on Wikipedia with Wikipedia's freely licencing means that anyone (commercial or non-commercial) can re-use them. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It's true; But, I think that Both File:Tata WPL Logo.webp and File:TATA IPL Logo.webp which are uploaded based on the same license could be re-licensed under . 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 17:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * We also have File:Women's Premier League.svg that's used on Women's Premier League (cricket), which of the two is actually the correct logo? The one that's correct can be used on Women's Premier League (cricket) article, but unless there's a specific logo for the 2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) season, we can't use a generic logo on that article (WP:GETTY point 14). Appreciate that Wikipedia image policy, particularly non-free image policy, is confusing and unlike anything else on the Internet, so hopefully my comments help try and work out which ones we can use. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * File:Women's Premier League.svg is the common logo for WPL while, File:Tata WPL Logo.webp is the current branded logo used in 2024. See IPL Editions for relevant information. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is the 2024 logo, why is it being used in both 2023 Women's Premier League (cricket) and 2024 Women's Premier League (cricket)? If it's a logo for both seasons, then it's too generic a logo to be used in either article, as per WP:GETTY point 14. I don't see anything on that logo that tells me it's a specific logo for the 2024 season (i.e. it doesn't have 2024 or WPL 2 listed on it). Joseph<b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Reoened and relisted to get more clarity on use as non-free in seasons versus general article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Each instance have its own logo but, BCCI doesn't use years or editions to disambiguate them. They change with the sponsorship changes; unfortunately, WPL has just begun and its too soon for that; but, the logos are specific for editions. (e.g: - IPL has the same logo since 2022 and probably until 2028; but 2020 & 2021 wasn't the same. It will possibly change in 2029 or soon depending on TATA's economic situations.) 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment I was the one that asked for a re-list, as I firmly believe this image on season article violates WP:GETTY point 14. It isn't a specific logo for the 2023 season, and it isn't a specific logo for the 2024 season, it's a general logo used sometimes within both seasons. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Remove from Season articles: Per @Joseph2302, the image also fails WP:NFCC in the Season articles, since it is not specific to the seasons it is being used to represent and as such it holds no contextual significance in those places. I could, however, stand to see it used in the general article about the league itself. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The image is apparently only used in season articles (against WP:GETTY per above); after removal of inappropriate uses it would fail WP:NFCC. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 01:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Requesting Speedy Deletion per G7–Author requests deletion. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 03:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RWBY Cover.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. <span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;font-variant-caps:small-caps;font-size:120%;">Fastily 09:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * File:RWBY Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BuckOneilaward.jpeg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:BuckOneilaward.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Coingeek ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per c:COM:FOP US, there is no freedom of panorama in the United States for sculptures. This statue was unveiled in 2008. ✗ plicit  11:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: If I'm not mistaken, the uploading of this image would pose a copyright violation per c:COM:FOP US, if the uploader did not have permission to do so, from the owner of the sculpture's copyright. As such, this image likely meets criterion WP:F9 for WP:SPEEDY. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep and Re-license: Upon further review, I am striking my original vote and changing it to recommend that the image in question be kept and re-licensed as Non-free 3D art, since the image could actually stand to be used in the article to identify the award, if licensed with the aforementioned template. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 02:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a statue that is the main focus of the image so de minimis doe snot apply. The art work in question is a statue of Buck O'Neil for which the award is named.  It is not the actual award itself which does not appear to have any sort of trophy associated with it.  As such conversion to non-free use would fails to meet WP:NFCC if used for visual identification in the award article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Whpq Thank you for taking the time to research this award and for adding such crucial information to this discussion. As a result of my being made aware that the statue does not actually represent the award, as the uploader might have thought, I am striking my keep and re-license vote and reimplementing my original vote for WP:SPEEDY. I am recommending a speedy delete for the reasons stated in my original votes' rationale, as well as because the image is unsuitable for non-free use, due to the reasons stated above. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 06:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EOC Refugee Team flag.png
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:EOC Refugee Team flag.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Zowayix001 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is the logo of the EOC Refugee Team, which doesn't have a specific article. Use on EOC Refugee Team at the 2023 European Games is not appropriate, as per WP:GETTY point 17. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete : Per nom, the image also fails WP:NFCC. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As the original uploader, I've removed the logo from the article. Zowayix001 (talk) 02:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Zowayix001 Just so that you're aware, your removal of this image from the article (thereby orphaning it) actually causes the file itself to now meet criterion WP:F5 for WP:SPEEDY. As such, I am striking my original vote and changing it to Speedy Delete. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 03:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MemParkJaxEagle.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:MemParkJaxEagle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mgreason ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. This sculpture was created in 2011 and therefore too recent to be in public domain due to age. Photograph is not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: The image meets likely meets criterion WP:F5 WP:F9 for WP:SPEEDY, as it is an orphaned, freely licensed, photograph of a copyrighted statue. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as the statue is copyrighted and the image is not in use. Not elegible for sppedy deletion F5 as the photo is not tagged with a non-free license. -- Whpq (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you to @Whpq for clarifying that the image in question is not non-free as I had originally thought. As such, I am modifying my vote to reflect that image is likely a copyright violation, and also an orphaned free file. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 22:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BlessingLogo.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * File:BlessingLogo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mgreason ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The parent article Blessing of the Fleet is about the tradition rather than a specific organization. Therefore, I don't believe this non-free logo qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: The image in question refers to an example of the tradition being carried out in a specific city, while the article refers to the tradition overall. As such, the image fails NFCC, as the specific event that logo was created for does not encompass the entire tradition, which is carried out in many places besides the one referenced in the image. As a result, I do not see enough contextual significance to warrant further inclusion of this image in the article. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 23:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.