Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 17

 &lt; May 16 May 18 &gt;

File:Escapade (play).jpg

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaulting to status quo (non-free). -Fastily 09:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Escapade (play).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Lord Cornwallis ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is not a faithful two-dimensional reproduction of the play's poster (pamphlet?). Someone could take a photo of it and release the photo under a free license, per WP:FREER as well as WP:GETTY, point 16. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Public domain in the US at the very least. The nominator's claim (if I understand correctly) is that (1) there is no copyright in the poster/pamphlet, but (2) there is a copyright in the photograph because it has minor three-dimensional elements. To (1), the poster/pamphlet is PD-simple typesetting, below the US threshold of originality. To (2), the official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". Here, the pamphlet is a two-dimensional work, even though there are some minor folds in the photograph. ( I am misunderstanding "faithful two-dimensional reproduction", please let me know!) Wikiacc (¶) 21:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no creativity in the reproduction and no copyright in the image. But the text is copyrightable; some creative effort has gone into selecting and positioning the words, particularly the paragraphs at the bottom. Accordingly the fair use claim currently on the file is the appropriate licence. Do nothing. Stifle (talk) 07:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benedictine College Wordmark.png

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete There is a clear consensus that a non-free image is not acceptable here. The consensus is weaker on whether the image is above the threshold of originality, but we generally err on the side of declaring images copyrightable so I'm deleting. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Benedictine College Wordmark.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Corkythehornetfan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC- minimal number of non free images- as well as WP:NFCC, as it doesn't significantly enhance the article any more than the actual college logo itself. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I wonder whether PD-textlogo might apply here. Clear delete if not (NFCC#10c also not met). Stifle (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't think textlogo would apply given the B and cross device on the left, but whether that qualifies as sufficiently creative to be PD anyway I don't know. Thryduulf (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: My question is how is it different than any other university article on Wikipedia? It's not violating any guidelines. Corky  03:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Except it is different by using multiple logos when one would suffice, and it is violating our NFCC guidelines (and policies), as the nomination states. Stifle (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The question is whether it's compliant with our non free policy, which it isn't. If other articles do the same thing, they should also be removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Textbook WP:NFCC violation.  Also agree with the comments above that the "B" in complex enough to exceed TOO in the US.  -<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;font-variant-caps:small-caps;font-size:120%;">Fastily  09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beyonce-heat.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Beyonce-heat.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Theuhohreo ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The packaging is well below the threshold of originality. Someone could buy this product (as it is still on the market) and take a freely licensed photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10Rs, Obverse, Pakistani Rupee, 2008 320px.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:10Rs, Obverse, Pakistani Rupee, 2008 320px.jpg">File:10Rs, Obverse, Pakistani Rupee, 2008 320px.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Arotparaarms ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file has the same use, purpose, and copyright as files that were deleted at Files for discussion/2024 May 5 for not meeting WP:NFCC. Wikiacc (¶) 21:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pierre Victor Auger.jpg
<div class="archived boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Pierre Victor Auger.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Johnxxx9 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

From : –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 22:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I believe that could be used in such circumstances, especially if another image can readily be identified? Felix QW (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.