Wikipedia:Fringe scapegoats

It often happens that an editor will encounter opposition when attempting to portray a fringe view more favorably on Wikipedia. Typically the opposition is the result of Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policy, in particular its position on how fringe views are reported. Wikipedia is a mainstream encyclopedia; it is not a place where fringe views are promoted above mainstream views or given equal validity to mainstream views. Following the NPOV policy means that we place fringe views in the context of their reception by mainstream experts.

An editor who is insufficiently familiar with the NPOV policy, however, may mistakenly attribute the opposition he encounters to "biased editors" or "editors pushing a skeptical agenda". In this circumstance he is said to be creating fringe scapegoats, that is, placing blame on what he perceives to be biased editors instead of placing blame on the fact that the fringe theory has not gained traction in the relevant field and reported accordingly per the NPOV policy.

Proponents of fringe theories are often sheltered from mainstream scholarship and the wider academic world, either by choice or by circumstance. For such a proponent, Wikipedia may provide the first exposure to mainstream criticism. He may think, "Surely such criticism is not neutral!" For him, it may be irresistible to conclude that misbehaving Wikipedia editors have been conniving to violate the NPOV policy. In reality, the problem lies in his failure to fully grasp the NPOV policy, in particular the section of the policy dealing with fringe theories and its corresponding explanatory guideline. The NPOV policy dictates that criticism must be included.

The idea of misbehaving Wikipedia editors is especially alluring to the authors of fringe theories. By conjuring fringe scapegoats, fringe theorists are able shift the focus away from the shortcomings of their own theories and onto Wikipedia editors.