Wikipedia:GLAM/National Digital Forum/5 Things

__NOINDEX__ note: in the interest of honest transparency, this page as been hidden from google This is a presentation by User:Stuartyeates for GLAM/National_Digital_Forum on 5 things to think about when starting Wikipedia. This is a talk reflecting my point of view; particularly personal asides are in italics.

Create an account

 * Almost all pages can be edited without creating an account (‘as an IP’) but an account gives you greater privacy/confidentiality, allows for better feedback, and allows you to create pages
 * When creating an account you need to make a choice: whether to edit under your real name, or under a pseudonym. Wikipedia and other editors draw no distinction between real names and pseudonyms, but editors may form unconscious opinions, and off-wiki parties are sure to cast aspersions. You may use a pseudonym that looks like a real name or looks fanciful (User:The Blade of the Northern Lights / User:Why should I have a User Name? /  User:Not your siblings' deletionist)
 * User names with “WMF” in them or ending in ‘bot’ are reserved for staff members and robots respectively
 * User names identify a user and not a role or an organisation; names that imply institutional affiliation or role are prohibited (User:WhanganuiMuseum, User:Curator@WhanganuiMuseum, User:WhanganuiMuseumComms).

Edit pages for which you have sources within arm’s reach

 * Wikipedia is a tertiary source, based on secondary sources; all additions must be referenced to independent reliable sources. If you have easy access to sources about the pages you edit, you’re less likely to get lazy and cut corners. Easy access usually means either online or readily-accessible print copies.
 * Both print and digital are equally acceptable for sources, but digital sources are frequently easier for a larger range of people to find
 * If you have easy access to rare print sources, using them to expand articles is a contribution that few others can make; most GLAM workers have access to a research library in one form or another and this can be very useful
 * Independence and reliability of sources are big issues:
 * Autobiographies can be used for almost nothing except for religious affiliation and sexual orientation
 * YouTube, Twitter and blogs can be used for almost nothing except when the uploading accounts are the official accounts of reliable institutions or reputable people
 * A wide variety of newspapers a poor reputation for fact checking cannot be used for information about living people (or preferably at all)
 * Academic monographs, review journals, large-circulation newspapers with a reputation for accuracy, official sources, and other encyclopaedias are the kinds of sources to aim for
 * Audio, sign and video sources are also permitted, if they are independent and reliable.

Avoid conflicts of interest

 * Don’t edit pages you have a direct conflict of interest with (employer, self, family member, etc)
 * It is insanely hard to write in an encyclopaedic manner about people or organisations to whom you have strong attachments

Start with stubs

 * Stubs are short articles with just enough content to outline the subject of the article, and only enough references to verify its existence and notability
 * It's improbable that any well-meaning edit to a stub would not be an improvement: the more developed an article, the more finer points of styling, sourcing, formatting, etc. come into play
 * Stubs have fewer eyes on them, and those eyes judge less critically, giving new users more leeway to find their feet

Ask for help

 * IRC irc://irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-en-help
 * In person, see WP:New_Zealand_Wikipedians_by_location
 * On wiki:
 * WT:WikiProject_New_Zealand for wiki-related issues/content/people
 * WP:GLAM for a whole stack of GLAM-related materials
 * WP:BLP/N for issues with the biographies of living people (anywhere where libel might apply)
 * WP:Questions for help on a whole range of topics