Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2000 CECAFA Cup/1

2000 CECAFA Cup

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/2000_CECAFA_Cup/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted per consensus. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2014. While there are some citation needed tags, what shocked me was how much "nothing" there was. The article has ZERO information on the actual tournament. It's genuinely astonishing how much this fails broadness. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * De-list it quick fails good article criterion 3a, as it's not broad enough in its scope. At a minimum, I'd expect some sort of tournament summary for each phase, like in 2022 FIFA World Cup. The "Background" section is about different tournaments and so is barely relevant, and thus falls foul of criterion 3b. There's also almost no referencing, the whole set of stats is sourced to one article (which doesn't verify some of the tables), thus it also fails criteria 2b and 2c. Can't believe it was ever listed as a GA in the first place, the standards in 2014 must have been ridiculously low back then for this to be considered good. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)