Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2011 Super Outbreak/1

2011 Super Outbreak

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/2011_Super_Outbreak/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisting per consensus. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

This article has suffered over the last decade plus from WP:HALFLIFE and a lack of updates. Never fully fleshed out to begin with, the article's aftermath section was never properly expanded even after a notice was put up about it. Over the years there have been many journal articles published about the event, of which only one has been incorporated. There is an immense amount of work required to get this article up to par. At present there is no need for a thorough review of the article until published journals (primarily from the AMS) are incorporated and the aftermath section is written. If that is done I am open to continuing with a further review to ensure the article is up to GA standards. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 20:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I think that is a really good idea. There are some other weather articles that could use that as well. Chess  Eric  00:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , if you know of any off the top of your head, please feel free to nominate them at GAR. There's a script at the top of the GAR page which makes the whole process much easier. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know. Chess  Eric  01:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm a little confused on how to do it though. Could you show me? Chess  Eric  01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * For example, I think the February 2009 North American storm complex article needs a GAR. How do I request one? Chess  Eric  01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you install the User:SD0001/GAR-helper script, there should be an option for "GAR" in the menu where you normally find the "Move" button, . AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 07:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Why didn’t you just do it instead of wasting time here lol. United States Man (talk) 01:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm focused on other articles and don't want to spend the time researching and writing this one. I'm happy to guide and help others who are able to put forth the effort on this one though. I've brought it up multiple times over the years and it's just time for this process to begin. If an article isn't up to standards it shouldn't be displayed as such. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 02:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , do you mind providing links to the journal articles you refer to? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Of course, links are below. These are the main journals that are easy to find through the American Meteorological Society. There are many other journal articles that are not primarily focused on the outbreak but have information pertaining to it. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Severe Weather Forecasts and Public Perceptions: An Analysis of the 2011 Super Outbreak in Tuscaloosa, Alabama
 * Tornado Debris Characteristics And Trajectories During The 27 April 2011 Super Outbreak As Determined Using Social Media Data (this is presently only used to cite the opening sentence, no actual substance used)
 * Meteorological Overview of the Devastating 27 April 2011 Tornado Outbreak
 * Multiscale Aspects of the 26–27 April 2011 Tornado Outbreak. Part I: Outbreak Chronology and Environmental Evolution
 * Multiscale Aspects of the 26–27 April 2011 Tornado Outbreak. Part II: Environmental Modifications and Upscale Feedbacks Arising from Latent Processes
 * The Influence of Cell Mergers on Supercell Characteristics and Tornado Evolution on 27–28 April 2011
 * Observed Characteristics of the Tornadic Supercells of 27–28 April 2011 in the Southeast United States
 * Analysis of Tornado-Induced Tree Fall Using Aerial Photography from the Joplin, Missouri, and Tuscaloosa–Birmingham, Alabama, Tornadoes of 2011
 * The 2011 Tornadoes and the Future of Tornado Research