Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Aarhus/1

Aarhus

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Aarhus/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept - issues have been addressed. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2014. Some uncited material that needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Will look into this over the next few days.--Ipigott (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)


 * As far as I can see, there are no longer any unreferenced passages in the article. Please let me know,, if any further work is needed.--Ipigott (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * There's "In the 1980s the city entered a period of rapid growth[clarification needed]" at the Post-World War II years section and that's it from what i can see. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I missed this as it was from 2017. Now OK I hope.--Ipigott (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Seems good. Though I will wait for the opinions of other people Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Good article (heh). AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - I don't quite understand what exactly needs to be addressed, "Some uncited material" is a very general comment. I'm opposed to just unlisting a GA all of a sudden. It's the easiest route. I think sources in the lead are not necessary, but other than that, at the moment, it looks like a very well-sourced, and indeed, good article. Please be more specific as to what needs to be addressed. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  11:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)