Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Adem Jashari/1

Adem Jashari

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Adem_Jashari/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Significant NPOV issues and changes since article was reviewed 13yrs ago.  // Timothy :: talk  23:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please spell out the NPOV issues that you are concerned about. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there meant to be two reassessments going on at the same time? (Good article reassessment/Adem Jashari/2) I suggest that the second one (which no-one has commented on yet) gets deleted.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Since the second nomination doesn't seem to be right, or even in existence, I've removed it from the talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It is quite un-obvious why this article should have been nominated, as it appears to be decently structured, neutrally written, and very fully cited to reliable sources. Unless there are pressing but non-obvious reasons (please state them), I'd !vote Speedy Keep. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)