Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Antoni Gaudí/1

Antoni Gaudí

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Antoni_Gaud%C3%AD/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Fails GA criterion 2b. Is lacking in inline citations. For example, the following paragraphs are completely uncited: first, fifth, and seventh paras in "Adulthood and professional work"; first para in "Gaudí and Modernisme"; fourth para in "Surpassing the Gothic"; all of "Urban spaces and landscaping"; first para of "Works"; last para of "University years"; etc. — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 16:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Agree about a shortage of in line citations. Also the citation style is not consistent (which I will work on now). I think that the existing references almost certainly contain sufficient information and just need the inlines added. I also think that there should probably be a Further reading section for all sorts of additional material. Gusfriend (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The citation style is now more consistent. I have also tagged a couple of references as possibly being user generated content. Gusfriend (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @PerfectSoundWhatever: It seems you forgot to notify the major WikiProjects. Given that it's a VIT4 article, we may be able to find somebody willing to rescue it. Gusfriend, nice work so far. Just FYI (you likely know this); consistent citations and a further reading section are not part of the GA criteria. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I would also mention it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vital Articles as there are a bunch of people there who are generalists. Improving citation consistency fits in with being a member of the VA WikiProject and is generally a good thing that I try to do from time to time. Gusfriend (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'll do that now. — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 18:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delist - currently we have orange template on top, 18 'Citation needed' and 3 'unreliable source?' tags, poorly written and partly unsourced Collaborators section, and extremely poor Death and legacy section. Article needs a lot of work, and now it's not a GA. Artem.G (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)