Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of Lade/1

Battle of Lade

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Battle_of_Lade/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Speedy delist due to overwhelming consensus. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Massive citation issues (reliability of sources, lack of inline citations, reliance on one source). Fails criterion 2 any day. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delist. The article is a paraphrase of Herodotus. T8612  (talk) 00:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delist. Concurred with T8612. Ifly6 (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Heavy reliance on single primary source. The initial History section lacks any citation.  Can't see it still meets modern GA standard . Monstrelet (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Aside from the sourcing questions – both the overreliance on direct citations to Herodotus, and some uncited claims which really need referencing – the lead is surely far too short to meet criterion 1b. By far the main editor,, hasn't edited wikipedia in nearly a decade, so unless someone else picks this up for rescuing I suspect it'll need delisting. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delist Large chunks of unsourced content and a commendable effort to be entirely made up of one primary source. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delist - not close to the modern standards for GA. Hog Farm Talk 18:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)