Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Bhagavad Gita/1

Bhagavad Gita

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Bhagavad_Gita/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: delisted Although the nomination for re-assessment is rather vague, I found a number of long outstanding citation needed tags and dead links. The prose could certainly do with a brush up and the organization of the article is poor. I would suggest a thorough clean up, followed by a peer review before renominating at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I request the re-assessment of the article bhagavad gita, because :
 * The article does not provide relevant information in the relevant section.
 * The introductory paragraph sounds awkward,as it contains referenced appraisal by some other persons, which is not the way to introduce a major book of a major religion of the world and may not represent a worldwide view of the topic.
 * The article, related to a major religious book is relatively less informative and neutral than the other major religious books of the world, like quran,bible or guru granth sahib. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bineetojha (talk • contribs) 09:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)‎
 * Comment: I see no evidence that primary editors or projects have been informed, which you should do. I fixed the article talk page as the GAR template had not been transcluded. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)