Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Bismuth/1

Bismuth

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Bismuth/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept.  141 Pr  {{{sup|contribs}}/Best page} 17:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

This article is a GA from 2012. There are lots of uncited material which needs to be cited. I've gone head and added some tags.  141 Pr  19:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I am going to start work on saving the GA tomorrow. I may remove or refactor statements with citation neededs if I feel they are unnecessary. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * There are no citation needed tags anymore as they have all been fixed by User:Materialscientist. Unless you can point out any other problems, I think we should close this reassessment as a keep. If the fact that it is an old GA is the only issue you have, then a lot of elements may need to undergo GARs. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I have cleaned up the article to some extent. Materialscientist (talk) 07:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)