Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Blackstone Inc./1

Blackstone Inc.

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Blackstone_Inc./1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

The article suffers from quite a few things: there are buzzwords in the lead(4), the investments are an extremely long list (1b), cn tags / occasional use of unreliable sources, many one-sentence paragraphs. Will need significant work to remain a GA. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delist. Without even looking into the sources, it's disqualified by the fact that it's mostly proseline and excessive lists. And I don't enforce this because I've yet to see a community mandate to do so, but I personally consider a criticism section to be a layout and NPOV issue in most cases. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)