Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees/1

Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Brown_v._Hotel_and_Restaurant_Employees/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: delisted (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Article passed GA in 2007. Our quality standards have since improved greatly, and this no longer meets them. There are claims that lack citations and the lead fails MOS:LEAD in its length and coverage. The prose arguably fails GA#1 too, due to its jumpy layout. Anarchyte ( talk ) 09:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow this is an old pass. From the days when any editor could just add the status without a review. It's not terrible considering. Have left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases and . Aircorn (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Not GA Intro is bad and sourcing isn't great. There's not photos. The background section is long and poorly formatted. Definitely doesn't give GA vibes. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)