Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia/1

Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Church_of_Scientology_editing_on_Wikipedia/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: No further concerns raised; closed as keep. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

the lead tag has been there for two years now. may fail criterion 1b. ltbdl (talk) 07:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Have removed tag -- a four-paragraph lead for a 24kb article is within normal variance, even if not what a completely literal reading of the "useful suggestions" (direct quote) on MOS:LEADLENGTH has. I've also trimmed a few overlong sentences and extraneous details from the lead in the process, so it shouldn't be a wall of text now. Are there any other concerns? Vaticidalprophet 09:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * This was nominated by a "brand new" editor oddly well-versed in Wikipedia editing esoterica. Grorp (talk) 01:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * this is a clean start account. ltbdl (talk) 04:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * GAR isn't that hard to find these days, even outside the clean start context (which is entirely valid), and even a new editor could reasonably look at a long-term-tagged GA and want to ask questions about it. I'm just not sure if there are any further concerns than the marginally relevant tag (I ended up chopping some more out of the lead after the original message). The article is a little quote-heavy, which was common for its author; some of them could be paraphrased, but I don't know if they're at the "absolutely needing it to fit GACR" point rather than the "it would be a good idea" point, so possibly worth a second opinion. Vaticidalprophet 10:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)