Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cologne Mosque project/1

Cologne Mosque project

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: List as GA. The article was checked against the criteria, minor issues were fixed, and the article is now GA standard. Geometry guy 12:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

This received a GA review which failed it for inherent instability. Discussion there and at WT:GAN suggests this fail may have been inappropriate. With a reasonable hold period, would this article pass now? Geometry guy 21:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Is that the official name? Das Köln-Moschee-Projekt, oder was? Yobmod (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak fail. Only took a glance, but the lead is insufficent and shuld be expanded to give a summary of the article. The full 4 paragraphs may not be needed, but should be more than now. Also has a single paragraph section and many very short paragraphs - i think it should be restructured, with more equal sectioning or subsections.
 * Please reconsider, as I have expanded the lead.Bless sins (talk) 16:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * List as GA. The lead was the main thing bothering me. That has been fixed, and the rest of the article looks fine. However, I'm happy to hear arguments to close as no action and renominate. I just don't think that is necessary. Geometry guy 18:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * List as GA. Note: I'm one of the major authors of the article.Bless sins (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article is almost ready to be listed now that the lead has been beefed up. There's a few loose ends to tidy:
 * There's a weasel tag which needs to be addressed
 * Footnote #5 ("Plans to lower height...") needs to be properly formatted
 * There's a stray appearing in the body of the text
 * Can someone help out with these? Thanks, Majoreditor (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well spotted, but easily fixed. Geometry guy 22:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * List. It meets GA criteria. Majoreditor (talk) 02:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)