Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Community/1

Community

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Community/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: delist Concerns have been raised about referencing and the lead which does not summarize the article in the manner required in WP:LEAD. Embedded lists and poor prose are also concerns. Editors and projects have been notified but no remedial action has been taken. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I've listed for GAR, because I feel the that article does meet the GA criteria 2b since the "Communitarianism" and "Types of community" sections is completely unsorced. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  11:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delist. There are so many unsourced sections I can't see this retaining GA status. It had a GAR 3 years ago in a sweep and the article looks almost identical. It shouldn't have been kept then, I didn't check how the article compares now to GAN however. I don't see the point of keeping this one open much past the due date, its not a very sexy topic and not a well maintained article - I doubt anybody will source now or anytime soon and there is too much to do. Szzuk (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * There have been just 2 article edits since the start of this GAR. Vandalism and revert. Szzuk (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Agree with the above about the referencing. The lead needs work and the prose in general could do with a quick once over and not too keen on the use of embedded lists in sections. Notified the Wikiprojects Community (which looks stale) and Sociology plus User:Sunray so it has a chance. AIR corn (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delist No improvements to article. AIR corn (talk) 04:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree with the above, as well - but, then, I'm new here.Meclee (talk) 04:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)