Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Copenhagen Metro/1

Copenhagen Metro

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Copenhagen_Metro/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: 'Delisted Consensus here that it doesn't meet the GA criteria AIRcorn (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Looking through this page, I have noticed that their are certain sections of the article that doesn't have any references in it at all which in my eyes would fail if it was done today. There is also the fact that in the section, "Future lines discussed", there isn't enough prose in this section to have this bit of the article. Add to the fact that their are sections which needs a reference and it's probably worth a shot at maybe reassessing this article. HawkAussie (talk) 04:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree that the article probably fails criteria 2a (list of all sources) and 2c (original research). I think it could be appropriate to just remove unreferenced material, since some of it is clearly unattributed speculation. Jc86035 (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delist - in addition to these examples mentioned above, there are now several update tags. Unless someone updates this article very soon, this will be a pretty major problem and can't continue being a GA in the future. Unfortunately I don't speak Danish so I can't update it myself. I think we should also ping the recent editors who have been most active on this page, . epicgenius (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No objections from me. I would say the article is pretty far from GA status (my recent edits only patch the worst holes). I would, however, consider it worthwhile to make sure the editors active around the time of the original GA award are made aware of this process (since they are presumably native Danes with the best access to DA language sources) CapnZapp (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , are the two that was around those people who nominated and did the nomination respectively in that year. HawkAussie (talk) 03:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)