Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Félix Trinidad/1

Félix Trinidad

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: Not listed. Comments were not addressed; discussion was inert for 15 days. PeterSymonds | talk  09:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I support my talk page comments concerning failing this article, but the page's nominator questions my assessment.User:calbear22 (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've done a careful second review of the article, and in general agree with Calbear22 original assessment. In my opinion, the article does not yet meet the good article criteria for paragraphs or lead sections.  I've left more detailed comments from this review and suggestions on improvements at the article's talk page.--jwandersTalk 18:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article doesn't meet GA standards at this time. In addition to issues raised by other editors I'd like to point out that the lead needs to be re-written. At present it's one massive, dense paragraph. It also doesn't tell us up front the most significant facts about Felix Trinidad. Rather, it serves up information in a chronological fashion. Please refer to WP:LEAD for suggestions on how to structure a good introduction. Majoreditor (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist per my comments above. The issues haven't been fixed. Sorry. Majoreditor (talk) 03:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)